Divider
  Speech Technology and Research Laboratory
  People
  Current Research Activities
  Past Research Activities
  Publications
  Career Opportunities
  Seminars
  Technologies for License
  In the News
  Contact Us
  STAR Search
  Information and Computing Sciences Division
SpacerAbout UsDividerR and D DivisionsDividerCareersDividerNewsroomDividerContact UsDividerSRI HomeSpacer

Spacer
         
  SRI Logo

Search SRILM-USER Archives

Match: Format: Sort by:
Search:

GT coefficients

From: ilya oparin <ioparin at ADDRESS HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 14:05:10 +0100 (BST)

--0-446703956-1150031110=:79145
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hello!

If I count GT coefficients in advance and then feed GT-files (generated by make-gt-discounts) to ngram-count or make-big-lm, I get warnings of the kind

file.gt1: line 9: warning: discount coefficient 1 = 0.0
file.gt1: line 9: warning: discount coefficient 2 = 0.0
...

and so on for all the gt parameters. Files themselves are alright and do not contain any zeroes. Number next to line corresponds to the last line in a gt-file.
The model I get with this differs from that I get when just use ngram-count without loading GT coefficients (it appears much smaller in bigrams and trigrams) with the same gtmin and gtmax values.
Could anybody tell me why it happens like this?

best regards,
Ilya
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--0-446703956-1150031110=:79145
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hello!<br><br>If I count GT coefficients in advance and then feed GT-files (generated by make-gt-discounts) to ngram-count or make-big-lm, I get warnings of the kind<br><br>file.gt1: line 9: warning: discount coefficient 1 = 0.0<br>file.gt1: line 9: warning: discount coefficient 2 = 0.0<br>...<br><br>and so on for all the gt parameters. Files themselves are alright and do not contain any zeroes. Number next to line corresponds to the last line in a gt-file. <br>The model I get with this differs from that I get when just use ngram-count without loading GT coefficients (it appears much smaller in bigrams and trigrams) with the same gtmin and gtmax values. <br>Could anybody tell me why it happens like this? <br><BR><BR>best regards,<br>Ilya<p> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--0-446703956-1150031110=:79145--

Click here to go to the SRILM home page.

 

About Us  Vertical divider  R&D Divisions  Divider  Careers  Divider  Newsroom  Divider  Contact Us
©2006 SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025-3493
SRI International is an independent, nonprofit corporation. Privacy policy

Last modified Dec 02, 2008